To a scornful growth economist

Keith Hudson

To a growth economist who was more than a little scornful of a recent Lancet/Rockefeller Report promoting desirable environmentally-friendly changes, I wrote the following:

If I understand the main thrust of the Lancet/Rockefeller Report correctly it’s probably dead-right in that what it envisages will probably take place.  In case you haven’t noticed, modern technology is gradually moving away from metal-based technology (requiring high-intensity energy inputs) towards carbon-based materials of far more versatile physical specifications and performance (needing only low-intensity solar energy).

And this applies to electronics, too, with DNA-based algorithmic computer software, synthetic DNA memory (self-reparable and thus more durable than present day memory chips, vulnerable to radiation damage) and DNA super-conductance along their cores.  More than that, waste products and unfashionable goods can be completely recycled with synthetic bacteria unlike the pollution of the present metal-based era.

How long will all this take?  A lot longer than some of the more superficial environmentists imagine — with their, at present, risible ideas about ‘renewable’ technologies (windfarms, solar cells, etc) — but it’s happening, nonetheless, with a celerity of discovery that’s quite awe-inspiring.  We’ll see many serious ecology-friendly (and economics-friendly) developments this side of 2100, I’m sure.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s